Hicks v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Hicks v. United States

594 F. App'x 214

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2015·No. No. 14-7309·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Hicks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1657 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hicks v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-02103-ELH (D.Md. July 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Hicks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1657 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hicks v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-02103-ELH (D.Md. July 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Hicks v. United States, 594 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

594 F. App'x 214 (Hicks v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related