Hicks v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.
This text of 250 A.D. 787 (Hicks v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—■ Order denying defendant’s motion for an order setting aside the verdict, vacating the judgment, and granting a new trial, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In the interest of substantial justice there should be a new trial. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D. 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-steeplechase-amusement-co-nyappdiv-1937.