Hicks v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.
250 A.D. 787, 296 N.Y.S. 252, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9008
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 30, 1937·No. Appeal No. 1.·Published
Opinion
—■ Order denying defendant’s motion for an order setting aside the verdict, vacating the judgment, and granting a new trial, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In the interest of substantial justice there should be a new trial. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hicks v. Steeplechase Amusement Co., 250 A.D. 787, 296 N.Y.S. 252, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
250 A.D. 787 (Hicks v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.