Hicks v. State
This text of 170 S.W. 279 (Hicks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appellant was convicted for the abandonment of his wife and failure to support her.
The testimony for the State is sufficient to support the verdict. The testimony introduced on the part of appellant refutes the charge in the indictment and contradicts the testimony for the State. This was a matter for the jury, and this court would not feel justified in reversing on account of the conflict in the testimony. Therefore, the judgment will have to be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 S.W. 279, 75 Tex. Crim. 97, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-state-texcrimapp-1914.