Hicks v. State
170 S.W. 279, 75 Tex. Crim. 97, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 433
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 28, 1914·No. No. 3284.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Appellant was convicted for the abandonment of his wife and failure to support her.
The testimony for the State is sufficient to support the verdict. The testimony introduced on the part of appellant refutes the charge in the indictment and contradicts the testimony for the State. This was a matter for the jury, and this court would not feel justified in reversing on account of the conflict in the testimony. Therefore, the judgment will have to be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hicks v. State, 170 S.W. 279, 75 Tex. Crim. 97, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 433 (Tex. 1914).
170 S.W. 279 (Hicks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weber v. State
181 S.W. 459 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)