Hicks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hicks v. State

1934 OK CR 124, 36 P.2d 951, 56 Okla. Crim. 232, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 65

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided October 12, 1934·No. No. A-8775.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of a second and subsequent violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve one year and one day in the penitentiary.

The record was filed in this court July 27, 1934; no brief in support of the appeal has been filed.

An examination discloses no fundamental error. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of a second and subsequent violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve one year and one day in the penitentiary.

The record was filed in this court July 27, 1934; no brief in support of the appeal has been filed.

An examination discloses no fundamental error. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The case is affirmed.

Hicks v. State, 1934 OK CR 124, 36 P.2d 951, 56 Okla. Crim. 232, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 65 (Okla. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

1934 OK CR 124 (Hicks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.