Hicks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hicks v. State

1934 OK CR 124, 36 P.2d 951, 56 Okla. Crim. 232, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 65

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 12, 1934

DocketNo. A-8775.

StatusPublished

This text of 1934 OK CR 124 (Hicks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. State, 1934 OK CR 124, 36 P.2d 951, 56 Okla. Crim. 232, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 65 (Okla. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of a second and subsequent violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve one year and one day in the penitentiary.

The record was filed in this court July 27, 1934; no brief in support of the appeal has been filed.

An examination discloses no fundamental error. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of a second and subsequent violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve one year and one day in the penitentiary.

The record was filed in this court July 27, 1934; no brief in support of the appeal has been filed.

An examination discloses no fundamental error. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1934 OK CR 124, 36 P.2d 951, 56 Okla. Crim. 232, 1934 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-state-oklacrimapp-1934.