Hicks v. State
516 S.W.3d 455, 2017 WL 1496948, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 333
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hicks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 233 →
Opinion
ORDER
Joseph Hicks appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court did not clearly err. We affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hicks v. State, 516 S.W.3d 455, 2017 WL 1496948, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 333 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).
516 S.W.3d 455 (Hicks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.