Hicks v. State
860 S.W.2d 392, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1363, 1993 WL 327138
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hicks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 204 →
Opinion
[393]*393ORDER
Movant, John Hicks, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for stealing a motor vehicle for which movant was sentenced on his plea of guilty to imprisonment for three years.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hicks v. State, 860 S.W.2d 392, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1363, 1993 WL 327138 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
860 S.W.2d 392 (Hicks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.