Hicks v. State

96 S.E. 1046, 22 Ga. App. 619, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 629
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 8, 1918
Docket9669
StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.E. 1046 (Hicks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hicks v. State, 96 S.E. 1046, 22 Ga. App. 619, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 629 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bloodwobth, J.

By consent t’his case was tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury. The motion for new trial contains the general grounds only. There is ample evidence to support' the finding, and this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in.refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. 'J:, and Harwell, J.,' concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 S.E. 1046, 22 Ga. App. 619, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-state-gactapp-1918.