Hicks v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hicks v. State

47 S.E. 547, 120 Ga. 176, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 486

DecidedMay 10, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 47 S.E. 547 (Hicks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. State, 47 S.E. 547, 120 Ga. 176, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 486 (Ga. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, J.

1. This case was argued by brief. Assignments of error set forth in an amendment to a motion for a new trial, but not insisted on in the brief filed by counsel for the plaintiff in error, will be treated as having been abandoned. Moss v. Bohanon, 111 Ga. 871.

2. There was ample evidence to warrant the verdict; and no error of law appearing, and the finding of the jury having received the approval of the trial judge, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI