Hicks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hicks v. State

72 So. 3d 236, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15770, 2011 WL 4598224

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hicks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1001 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 2011·No. 1D11-2687·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition is granted and Sylvester Hicks is hereby afforded belated appeal from judgment and sentence of the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Case No. 2010-CF-000619A. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of the opinion will be provided to the clerk of the circuit court who shall treat it as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

The trial court shall appoint counsel to represent appellant if he qualifies for such an appointment.

PETITION GRANTED.

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition is granted and Sylvester Hicks is hereby afforded belated appeal from judgment and sentence of the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Case No. 2010-CF-000619A. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of the opinion will be provided to the clerk of the circuit court who shall treat it as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

The trial court shall appoint counsel to represent appellant if he qualifies for such an appointment.

PETITION GRANTED.

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.

Hicks v. State, 72 So. 3d 236, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15770, 2011 WL 4598224 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

72 So. 3d 236 (Hicks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.