Hicks v. State

962 S.W.2d 813, 332 Ark. 616, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 237
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 16, 1998
DocketCR 98-353
StatusPublished

This text of 962 S.W.2d 813 (Hicks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hicks v. State, 962 S.W.2d 813, 332 Ark. 616, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 237 (Ark. 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Ben Wesley Hicks, by his attorneys, Tapp Law Offices, by Tamra Barrett, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal from the denial of his petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 37. His attorney admits that the record of the postconviction proceedings was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
962 S.W.2d 813, 332 Ark. 616, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-state-ark-1998.