Hicks v. State

129 So. 480, 23 Ala. App. 589, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 193
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hicks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Ala. App. 507
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1930·No. 7 Div. 676.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was charged by affidavit with having operated a motor vehicle on the public highway “while in an intoxicated condition.” No demurrer was interposed, por was the charge otherwise tested on the trial. One of the definitions given by Webster’s Dictionary of intoxicated is: “Under the influence of intoxicating liquors or drugs.” The insistence is here made that the affidavit *590 charges no offense. With this contention we do not agree. The charge is defective, but not void, and, in the absence of a legal challenge, will support a conviction.

The testimony was in conflict, and under the decisions we cannot say that the conclusions as to the facts were so wrong and unjust as to require a reversal.

Let the judgment he affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hicks v. State, 129 So. 480, 23 Ala. App. 589, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 193 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

129 So. 480 (Hicks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.