Hicks v. Solis

473 F. App'x 331
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1151
StatusPublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 331 (Hicks v. Solis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hicks v. Solis, 473 F. App'x 331 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Miachel H. Hicks appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hicks’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Hicks has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 F. App'x 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-solis-ca4-2012.