Hicks v. Shadad
This text of 1915 OK 802 (Hicks v. Shadad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the plaintiff in error is attempting to appeal to this court without incorporating into the record a copy of the judgment or order appealed from. The record must show the rendition and entry in- the lower court of the judgment, decree, or order appealed from, and where the record fails to contain a copy of the final judgment or order of the lower court from which the appeal is taken this court acquires no jurisdiction, and the appeal will be dismissed. Ford v. McIntosh, 22 Okla. 423, 98 Pac. 341; Jones v. Bilby et al., 43 Okla. 494, 143 Pac. 330; Gardenhire v. Burdick, 7 Okla. 212, 54 Pac. 483; Board v. Moon, 8 Okla. 205, 57 Pac. 161; Sproat v. Durland, 7 Okla. 230, 54 Pac. 458; Boorigie Bros. v. Rainey-Davis Mercantile Company, 47 Okla. 97, 147 Pac. 774.
The motion to dismiss is sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1915 OK 802, 151 P. 1017, 49 Okla. 137, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-shadad-okla-1915.