Hicks v. Rosenbaum
172 A.D. 900, 156 N.Y.S. 967
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 172 A.D. 900 (Hicks v. Rosenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hicks v. Rosenbaum, 172 A.D. 900, 156 N.Y.S. 967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
The order appealed from should be modified by confining the examination to the issues raised by the denials in the answer, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Page, JJ. Order affirmed as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
172 A.D. 900, 156 N.Y.S. 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-rosenbaum-nyappdiv-1916.