Hicks v. Prudential General Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hicks v. Prudential General Insurance Co.

887 S.W.2d 819, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1880

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 6, 1994·No. No. 65660·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiff Deborah Hicks’ claim of vexatious refusal to pay. We find that there is no genuine dispute of material fact and that defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 381-82[17] (Mo. banc 1993).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.

We affirm the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiff Deborah Hicks’ claim of vexatious refusal to pay. We find that there is no genuine dispute of material fact and that defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 381-82[17] (Mo. banc 1993).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.

We affirm the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Hicks v. Prudential General Insurance Co., 887 S.W.2d 819, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1880 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

887 S.W.2d 819 (Hicks v. Prudential General Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related