Hicks v. Pope

57 S.E. 923, 1 Ga. App. 348, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 238
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 2, 1907
Docket119
StatusPublished

This text of 57 S.E. 923 (Hicks v. Pope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hicks v. Pope, 57 S.E. 923, 1 Ga. App. 348, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 238 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

A sued B on a note which B had given to him for legal services to be rendered as attorney in a certain suit for damages against C. The defense set up was that the consideration for said note had failed, because A had not rendered any of the services for which said note had been given. A attempted to meet this defense by showing that B had prevented him from performing such services by settling said litigation with O. On the trial the evidence was conflicting, and the jury found for the defendant. No error of law is complained of, and the discretion of the trial court in refusing to grant a new trial will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 S.E. 923, 1 Ga. App. 348, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-pope-gactapp-1907.