Hicks v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Hicks v. People

146 P.2d 992, 112 Colo. 150, 1944 Colo. LEXIS 153

Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided March 20, 1944·No. No. 15,371.·Published

Opinion

per Curiam.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of a conspiracy to obtain money from Jefferson county by means of the confidence game. The prosecution arose under the joint indictment involved in the recently-considered case of Olde v. People, 112 Colo. 15, 145 P. (2d) 100. The Attorney General has filed a confession of error, consenting to the reversal of the judgment of conviction and *151 the remanding of the cause to the district court for such further action as may be indicated. In these circumstances, in accord with our pronouncements in the opinions in Soto v. People, 64 Colo. 528, 173 Pac. 399, and Richardson v. People, 69 Colo. 155, 170 Pac. 189, the judgment is reversed and- the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

per Curiam.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of a conspiracy to obtain money from Jefferson county by means of the confidence game. The prosecution arose under the joint indictment involved in the recently-considered case of Olde v. People, 112 Colo. 15, 145 P. (2d) 100. The Attorney General has filed a confession of error, consenting to the reversal of the judgment of conviction and *151 the remanding of the cause to the district court for such further action as may be indicated. In these circumstances, in accord with our pronouncements in the opinions in Soto v. People, 64 Colo. 528, 173 Pac. 399, and Richardson v. People, 69 Colo. 155, 170 Pac. 189, the judgment is reversed and- the cause remanded.

Hicks v. People, 146 P.2d 992, 112 Colo. 150, 1944 Colo. LEXIS 153 (Colo. 1944).

Pincite

146 P.2d 992 (Hicks v. People) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related