Hicks v. Otto
This text of 17 F. 539 (Hicks v. Otto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion of defendants, now heard, for an amendment of the answer, and a commission to take the testimony of Den-ton, in London, to show that he, and not Peroni, is the original inventor of improvements in thermometers, patented to the orator as assignee of Peroni, must he denied. While such motions are granted with liberality, some prospect is required that there is evidence to support the amendment which can be had. Here, the affidavit of Denton, filed by the orator in opposition to the motion, stating that he does not claim to be and is not, and that Peroni is, the original inventor, and his refusal to make an affidavit for the defendants to the contrary, on their application, show that there is no such prospect. Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 F. 539, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-otto-circtsdny-1883.