Hicks v. New Jersey Car-Spring & Rubber Co.
This text of 52 N.Y.S. 1143 (Hicks v. New Jersey Car-Spring & Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No opinion. Order modified by striking out the provision that, in default of the service of the bill of particulars, the answer of defendant be stricken out, and in lieu thereof providing that, in case of such default, the defendant "be precluded from giving evidence on the trial of the allegation, a bill of particulars of which, by said order, he is directed to furnish, without costs to either party. See 47 N. Y. Supp. 1137, and 49 N. Y. Supp. 401.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 N.Y.S. 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-new-jersey-car-spring-rubber-co-nyappdiv-1898.