Hicks v. Merry

Supreme Court of Missouri

Hicks v. Merry

4 Mo. 355

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedJune 15, 1836

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Mo. 355 (Hicks v. Merry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. Merry, 4 Mo. 355 (Mo. 1836).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion delivered by

Wash, Judge.

■ The objections insisted on by the appellant’s counsel cannot be raised. The evidence given or rejected, and the decisions of the justices thereon, form no part of the record, process or proceedings to be reviewed in the circuit court; these appear in due form and to have been taken in proper time, and it is only for want of some formality in the proceedings, or for some defect in the process, that the judgment of the justices is to be set aside. The judgment is affirmed with costs, and it is ordered that a writ of restitution be awarded to the ap-pellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion delivered by

Wash, Judge.

■ The objections insisted on by the appellant’s counsel cannot be raised. The evidence given or rejected, and the decisions of the justices thereon, form no part of the record, process or proceedings to be reviewed in the circuit court; these appear in due form and to have been taken in proper time, and it is only for want of some formality in the proceedings, or for some defect in the process, that the judgment of the justices is to be set aside. The judgment is affirmed with costs, and it is ordered that a writ of restitution be awarded to the ap-pellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Mo. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-merry-mo-1836.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack