Hicks v. Mennonite Mut. Ins.

945 N.E.2d 1063, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1467
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 25, 2011·No. 2011-0462·Published

Opinion

Miami App. No. 10CA17, 2011-Ohio-499. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal.

Upon consideration of cross-appellants’ application for dismissal of its cross-appeal, it is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, the cross-appeal is dismissed. Appellant’s appeal remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hicks v. Mennonite Mut. Ins., 945 N.E.2d 1063, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1467 (Ohio 2011).

945 N.E.2d 1063 (Hicks v. Mennonite Mut. Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.