Hicks v. McDonnell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Hicks v. McDonnell

99 Mass. 459

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1868

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 Mass. 459 (Hicks v. McDonnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. McDonnell, 99 Mass. 459 (Mass. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

Hoar, J.

The award of the arbitrators to whom the rule ot court issued could not be accepted while the record showed that another person was substituted in the place of one of them. If the proceeding under the rule first issued was by the agreement of the parties and sanctioned by the court, the record should be amended to show that fact before the award should be accepted.

Acceptance of award set aside, and case remitted for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoar, J.

The award of the arbitrators to whom the rule ot court issued could not be accepted while the record showed that another person was substituted in the place of one of them. If the proceeding under the rule first issued was by the agreement of the parties and sanctioned by the court, the record should be amended to show that fact before the award should be accepted.

Acceptance of award set aside, and case remitted for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 Mass. 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-mcdonnell-mass-1868.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack