Hicks v. Luciano

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hicks v. Luciano

844 So. 2d 809, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7060, 2003 WL 21076658

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 14, 2003

DocketNo. 4D01-4514

StatusPublished

This text of 844 So. 2d 809 (Hicks v. Luciano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. Luciano, 844 So. 2d 809, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7060, 2003 WL 21076658 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm a non-final order ordering appellant to pay child support and awarding primary residential responsibility • to appellee, which provided that the court would review the custody and visitation provisions in several months. This affir-mance is without prejudice to either party seeking review from the order finally determining these issues.

KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm a non-final order ordering appellant to pay child support and awarding primary residential responsibility • to appellee, which provided that the court would review the custody and visitation provisions in several months. This affir-mance is without prejudice to either party seeking review from the order finally determining these issues.

KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

844 So. 2d 809, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7060, 2003 WL 21076658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-luciano-fladistctapp-2003.