Hicks v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hicks v. Johnson

149 S.E. 786, 169 Ga. 246, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 326

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 28, 1929

DocketNo. 6937

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 S.E. 786 (Hicks v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. Johnson, 149 S.E. 786, 169 Ga. 246, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 326 (Ga. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

This ease came before this court upon a writ of error from the superior court of Richmond County; and after argument had, the same being for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in/ opinion, Russell, C. J., Beck, P. J., and Hill, J., being of the opinioi{ that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and Atkinson} Gilbert, and Hines, JJ., being of the contrary, opinion, the judgment' is affirmed by operation of law. ‘

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This ease came before this court upon a writ of error from the superior court of Richmond County; and after argument had, the same being for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in/ opinion, Russell, C. J., Beck, P. J., and Hill, J., being of the opinioi{ that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and Atkinson} Gilbert, and Hines, JJ., being of the contrary, opinion, the judgment' is affirmed by operation of law. ‘

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.E. 786, 169 Ga. 246, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-johnson-ga-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack