Hicks v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hicks v. Johnson

149 S.E. 786, 169 Ga. 246, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 326

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 28, 1929·No. No. 6937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

This ease came before this court upon a writ of error from the superior court of Richmond County; and after argument had, the same being for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in/ opinion, Russell, C. J., Beck, P. J., and Hill, J., being of the opinioi{ that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and Atkinson} Gilbert, and Hines, JJ., being of the contrary, opinion, the judgment' is affirmed by operation of law. ‘

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This ease came before this court upon a writ of error from the superior court of Richmond County; and after argument had, the same being for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in/ opinion, Russell, C. J., Beck, P. J., and Hill, J., being of the opinioi{ that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and Atkinson} Gilbert, and Hines, JJ., being of the contrary, opinion, the judgment' is affirmed by operation of law. ‘

Hicks v. Johnson, 149 S.E. 786, 169 Ga. 246, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 326 (Ga. 1929).

Pincite

149 S.E. 786 (Hicks v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related