Hicks v. Ivey
26 S.E. 68, 99 Ga. 648
This text of 26 S.E. 68 (Hicks v. Ivey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hicks v. Ivey, 26 S.E. 68, 99 Ga. 648 (Ga. 1896).
Opinion
Grant to Henry Pulling, deed from Henry Pullen; evidence admissible to show that these names designated one and the same person. Error in granting nonsuit. Dickerson v. Brady, 23 Ga. 161; Brooking v. Dearmond, 27 Ga. 58; McDowell v. Irwin. 32 Ga. 39; Clements v. Wheeler, 62 Ga. 53; 16 Am. & Eng. Enc. of Law, pp. 122-127, and notes.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Robinson v. Reward Ceramic Color Manufacturing, Inc.
170 S.E.2d 724 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Bolton v. Keys
144 S.E. 406 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co. v. Foster
100 P. 480 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 S.E. 68, 99 Ga. 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-ivey-ga-1896.