Hicks v. Ivey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hicks v. Ivey

26 S.E. 68, 99 Ga. 648

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1896·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Grant to Henry Pulling, deed from Henry Pullen; evidence admissible to show that these names designated one and the same person. Error in granting nonsuit. Dickerson v. Brady, 23 Ga. 161; Brooking v. Dearmond, 27 Ga. 58; McDowell v. Irwin. 32 Ga. 39; Clements v. Wheeler, 62 Ga. 53; 16 Am. & Eng. Enc. of Law, pp. 122-127, and notes.

Judgment reversed.

R. H. P-oioell ■& Son, for plaintiff. 'William D. Kiddoo, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons, C. J.

Grant to Henry Pulling, deed from Henry Pullen; evidence admissible to show that these names designated one and the same person. Error in granting nonsuit. Dickerson v. Brady, 23 Ga. 161; Brooking v. Dearmond, 27 Ga. 58; McDowell v. Irwin. 32 Ga. 39; Clements v. Wheeler, 62 Ga. 53; 16 Am. & Eng. Enc. of Law, pp. 122-127, and notes.

Judgment reversed.

R. H. P-oioell ■& Son, for plaintiff. 'William D. Kiddoo, for defendant.

Hicks v. Ivey, 26 S.E. 68, 99 Ga. 648 (Ga. 1896).

Pincite

26 S.E. 68 (Hicks v. Ivey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related