Hicks v. Hicks

134 A. 917, 100 N.J. Eq. 346, 15 Stock. 346, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 484
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 27, 1926·Published

Opinion

*347 Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, "Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hicks v. Hicks, 134 A. 917, 100 N.J. Eq. 346, 15 Stock. 346, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 484 (N.J. 1926).

134 A. 917 (Hicks v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.