Hicks v. Hicks
962 So. 2d 975, 2007 WL 2140591
Opinion
Lori HICKS, Appellant,
v.
Charles HICKS, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
William H. Drumm, of Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen Ginsburg, P.A. Sarasota, for Appellant.
Scott Gediman, of Gediman, Duffy Gediman P.C., Everett, MA, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The trial court's order enforcing the parties' prenuptial and marital settlement agreements was supported by competent, substantial evidence. An appellate court is not permitted to reweigh the evidence. Okoh v. Okoh, 918 So.2d 316 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS, LAWSON, EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hicks v. Hicks, 962 So. 2d 975, 2007 WL 2140591 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
962 So. 2d 975 (Hicks v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
RM v. Department of Children and Families
24 So. 3d 740 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)