Hicks v. Green

California Supreme Court

Hicks v. Green

9 Cal. 74

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1858

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 Cal. 74 (Hicks v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. Green, 9 Cal. 74 (Cal. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

The findings of the Court, which are supported by the evidence, fully establish the plaintiff’s right to recover. The defence sought to be established by the appellant was in the nature of a counterclaim, and should have been specially pleaded. The evidence offered was not admissible under the general issue.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

The findings of the Court, which are supported by the evidence, fully establish the plaintiff’s right to recover. The defence sought to be established by the appellant was in the nature of a counterclaim, and should have been specially pleaded. The evidence offered was not admissible under the general issue.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Cal. 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-green-cal-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack