Hicks v. Green

California Supreme Court

Hicks v. Green

9 Cal. 74

California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

The findings of the Court, which are supported by the evidence, fully establish the plaintiff’s right to recover. The defence sought to be established by the appellant was in the nature of a counterclaim, and should have been specially pleaded. The evidence offered was not admissible under the general issue.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

The findings of the Court, which are supported by the evidence, fully establish the plaintiff’s right to recover. The defence sought to be established by the appellant was in the nature of a counterclaim, and should have been specially pleaded. The evidence offered was not admissible under the general issue.

Judgment affirmed.

Hicks v. Green, 9 Cal. 74 (Cal. 1858).

Pincite

9 Cal. 74 (Hicks v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related