Hicks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 18, 2009
Docket09-7205
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hicks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Hicks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hicks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7205

DAVID HICKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; JOHN LAMANNA, Warden of FCI Edgefield in his official capacity,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (0:08-cv-01911-HFF)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 18, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Hicks, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006)

petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although

we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Hicks v. Fed. Bureau of

Prisons, No. 0:08-cv-01911-HFF (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 2009; filed

June 22, 2009 and entered June 23, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hicks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-federal-bureau-of-prisons-ca4-2009.