Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hicks v. Emeritus at Oakbridge

Hicks v. Emeritus at Oakbridge

192 So. 3d 1283, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9034, 2016 WL 3224085
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 2016
DocketNo. 1D16-1565
StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 3d 1283 (Hicks v. Emeritus at Oakbridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hicks v. Emeritus at Oakbridge, 192 So. 3d 1283, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9034, 2016 WL 3224085 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURrAM.

This court having received Appellees’ confession of error and request to remand based on the Supreme Court of Florida’s recent opinion in Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 192 So.3d 431, 41 Fla. L. Weekly S197, 2016 WL 1700521 (Fla. April 28, 2016), and finding that reversal is warranted in light of that opinion, the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with that opinion.

ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marvin Castellanos v. Next Door Company
192 So. 3d 431 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 So. 3d 1283, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9034, 2016 WL 3224085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-emeritus-at-oakbridge-fladistctapp-2016.