Hicks v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
250 F. App'x 542
Opinion
Christopher G. Hicks appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hicks v. Commissioner, No. l:06-cv-00222 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hicks v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 250 F. App'x 542 (4th Cir. 2007).
250 F. App'x 542 (Hicks v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.