Hicks v. Cohen
72 Ga. 210
Opinion
It appearing that the claimant had been made a party to a rule in reference to the judgment and execution by virtue of which the property claimed was levied on, and the claimant having withdrawn his claim, it is ordered that the writ of error on behalf of the claimant, on grounds in respect to errors in reference to the rule, be dismissed,—the claimant after the withdrawal of his claim having no interest in the said judgment and execution. 33 Ga.,. 205.
Writ of error dismissed.
(Head-note by the court.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hicks v. Cohen, 72 Ga. 210 (Ga. 1883).
72 Ga. 210 (Hicks v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Braswell v. Equitable Mortgage Co.
35 S.E. 322 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)