Hicks v. Cohen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hicks v. Cohen

72 Ga. 210

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 18, 1883

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 72 Ga. 210 (Hicks v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. Cohen, 72 Ga. 210 (Ga. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the claimant had been made a party to a rule in reference to the judgment and execution by virtue of which the property claimed was levied on, and the claimant having withdrawn his claim, it is ordered that the writ of error on behalf of the claimant, on grounds in respect to errors in reference to the rule, be dismissed,—the claimant after the withdrawal of his claim having no interest in the said judgment and execution. 33 Ga.,. 205.

Writ of error dismissed.

(Head-note by the court.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the claimant had been made a party to a rule in reference to the judgment and execution by virtue of which the property claimed was levied on, and the claimant having withdrawn his claim, it is ordered that the writ of error on behalf of the claimant, on grounds in respect to errors in reference to the rule, be dismissed,—the claimant after the withdrawal of his claim having no interest in the said judgment and execution. 33 Ga.,. 205.

Writ of error dismissed.

(Head-note by the court.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 Ga. 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-cohen-ga-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack