Hicks v. Cocks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hicks v. Cocks

172 A.D. 922, 156 N.Y.S. 1126

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hicks v. Cocks. Read the opinion of the Court — 167 A.D. 862 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that as to each defendant the examination directed would necessarily be to establish the facts which would tend to prove defendant guilty of a crime. (See People's Coat, Apron & Towel Supply v. Light, 168 App. Div. 143.) Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that as to each defendant the examination directed would necessarily be to establish the facts which would tend to prove defendant guilty of a crime. (See People's Coat, Apron & Towel Supply v. Light, 168 App. Div. 143.) Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Hicks v. Cocks, 172 A.D. 922, 156 N.Y.S. 1126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

172 A.D. 922 (Hicks v. Cocks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related