Hicks v. Cocks
This text of 172 A.D. 922 (Hicks v. Cocks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that as to each defendant the examination directed would necessarily be to establish the facts which would tend to prove defendant guilty of a crime. (See People's Coat, Apron & Towel Supply v. Light, 168 App. Div. 143.) Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 A.D. 922, 156 N.Y.S. 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-cocks-nyappdiv-1916.