Hicks v. City of Hazlehurst
This text of 82 S.E. 354 (Hicks v. City of Hazlehurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A municipal ordinance by which the right of appeal from the judgment of the mayor to the aldermen or common council of a municipality, is restricted by limiting the power of such aldermen or council to a mere affirmance or reversal of the antecedent judgment of the mayor, is not, because of such limitation, unconstitutional or void.
2. The trial was free from material error, and the conviction of the accused was authorized by some evidence; and therefore the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the writ of certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 S.E. 354, 14 Ga. App. 813, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-city-of-hazlehurst-gactapp-1914.