Hicks v. Chamberlin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hicks v. Chamberlin

710 So. 2d 993, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3171, 1998 WL 145236

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 27, 1998

DocketNo. 98-0842

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 710 So. 2d 993 (Hicks v. Chamberlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. Chamberlin, 710 So. 2d 993, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3171, 1998 WL 145236 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to set a hearing on his motion to dissolve a temporary ex parte injunction. We grant the petition.

The petition recites petitioner’s substantial efforts in the trial court throughout February to have a hearing set on his two applications for same before filing the present petition to seek relief.

The amended response does not dispute petitioner’s entitlement to a hearing on his motion within five days of the application as required by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.610(d).

Accordingly, we direct the trial court to set a hearing date within five days of the issuance of this opinion. A rehearing will not be entertained.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI