Hicks v. Chamberlin

710 So. 2d 993, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3171, 1998 WL 145236
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 1998·No. No. 98-0842·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to set a hearing on his motion to dissolve a temporary ex parte injunction. We grant the petition.

The petition recites petitioner’s substantial efforts in the trial court throughout February to have a hearing set on his two applications for same before filing the present petition to seek relief.

The amended response does not dispute petitioner’s entitlement to a hearing on his motion within five days of the application as required by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.610(d).

Accordingly, we direct the trial court to set a hearing date within five days of the issuance of this opinion. A rehearing will not be entertained.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hicks v. Chamberlin, 710 So. 2d 993, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3171, 1998 WL 145236 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

710 So. 2d 993 (Hicks v. Chamberlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lorraine Campbell and Charles Lamm v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
204 So. 3d 476 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Bailey v. Bailey
1 So. 3d 1292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Tsiperfal v. Ohio Savings Securities, Inc.
756 So. 2d 1087 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)