Hicks v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hicks v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

272 A.D.2d 576, 708 N.Y.S.2d 634, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6053

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 30, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 576 (Hicks v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 272 A.D.2d 576, 708 N.Y.S.2d 634, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6053 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated July 14, 1999, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant New York City Transit Authority which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendant New York City Transit Authority (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated July 14, 1999, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant New York City Transit Authority which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendant New York City Transit Authority (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 576, 708 N.Y.S.2d 634, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-brooklyn-union-gas-co-nyappdiv-2000.