Hickox v. State

658 So. 2d 560, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6591, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1486
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 1995·No. No. 94-96·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s post-conviction motion raises claims of newly discovered evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm in regard to the latter claims. In regard to the claim of newly discovered evidence, we remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or to attach portions of the record refuting the allegation.

ERVIN, MINER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hickox v. State, 658 So. 2d 560, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6591, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1486 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

658 So. 2d 560 (Hickox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Carter
658 So. 2d 560 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)