Hickox v. Chicago & Canada Southern Railway Co.

44 N.W. 143, 78 Mich. 615, 1889 Mich. LEXIS 880
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 28, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 44 N.W. 143 (Hickox v. Chicago & Canada Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hickox v. Chicago & Canada Southern Railway Co., 44 N.W. 143, 78 Mich. 615, 1889 Mich. LEXIS 880 (Mich. 1889).

Opinions

Morse, J.

In this case the defeasance in the deed of right of way of the plaintiff to the Chicago & Canada Southern Railway Company reads as follows:

“If the said railway company, its successors or assigns, should fail to complete said railway through said premises, and to put the same in operation, within three years from the date hereof, or if, after such railway is completed and put into operation, it should cease to be used and operated as a railroad, then, in either évent, this release shall cease to be operative, and the right of way granted thereunder shall terminate.”

We think that when this right of way ceased to be used and operated as a railroad, and was used only for the storing of cars, the defeasance became operative, and the conveyance had no further force or effect.

The judgment is correct, and is affirmed, with costs.

Sherwood, C. J., and Long, J., concurred with Morse, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Natural Resources v. Carmody-Lahti Real Estate, Inc
699 N.W.2d 272 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2005)
Ludington & Northern Railway v. Epworth Assembly
468 N.W.2d 884 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1991)
City of Boyne City v. Crain
446 N.W.2d 348 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1989)
Nogaj v. Nogaj
89 N.W.2d 513 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1958)
Hawkins v. Dillman
256 N.W. 492 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1934)
Marland v. Gillespie
1934 OK 158 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.
239 N.W. 376 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1931)
Weber v. Ford Motor Co.
222 N.W. 198 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1928)
Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern Railway
211 N.W. 99 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1926)
Gill v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
90 N.W. 606 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
Hickox v. Chicago & Canada Southern Railway Co.
53 N.W. 1105 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 N.W. 143, 78 Mich. 615, 1889 Mich. LEXIS 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickox-v-chicago-canada-southern-railway-co-mich-1889.