Hickory Capital, LLC v. SME Capital, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 30, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-10729·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED HICKORY CAPITAL, LLC, DOC DATE FILED: _ 5/30/2023 Plaintiff, -against- 22 Civ. 10729 (AT) SME CAPITAL, LLC, STEVE FELDMAN, and, ORDER GEORGE KING, Defendants. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: On March 14, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiffs attorney’s motion to withdraw and gave Plaintiff until May 15, 2023, to retain new counsel. ECF No. 19. No counsel has entered a notice of appearance on Plaintiffs behalf. Plaintiff is reminded that corporations and other artificial entities cannot proceed pro se. Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, Unit IT Men’s Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993); see also Jones v. Niagara Frontier Transp. Auth., 722 F.2d 20, 22 (2d Cu. 1983). Accordingly, by June 27, 2023, Plaintiff shall retam new counsel and such counsel shall file a notice of appearance. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se at 132 Central Avenue, Hillsdale, New Jersey 07642. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 30, 2023 New York, New York

ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hickory Capital, LLC v. SME Capital, LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Hickory Capital, LLC v. SME Capital, LLC (Hickory Capital, LLC v. SME Capital, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related