Hickman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hickman v. State

1925 OK CR 376, 238 P. 1118, 31 Okla. Crim. 207, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 410

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 14, 1925

DocketNo. A-5261.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 376 (Hickman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hickman v. State, 1925 OK CR 376, 238 P. 1118, 31 Okla. Crim. 207, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 410 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The information in this case charges that in Carter county, August 9, 1923, Son Hickman did take, steal, and carry away a certain Ford automobile, the personal property of W. L. Clayton. On the trial the jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty as charged in the information, and fixing his punishment at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of five .years. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, February 9, 1924, an appeal was taken by filing in this court on August 8, 1924, a petition in error with case-made. Counsel of record for plaintiff in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case, and asks that the mandate issue forthwith. The motion to dismiss the appeal is .allowed, and the appeal herein dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause its judgment and sentence to be carried into execution. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The information in this case charges that in Carter county, August 9, 1923, Son Hickman did take, steal, and carry away a certain Ford automobile, the personal property of W. L. Clayton. On the trial the jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty as charged in the information, and fixing his punishment at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of five .years. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, February 9, 1924, an appeal was taken by filing in this court on August 8, 1924, a petition in error with case-made. Counsel of record for plaintiff in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case, and asks that the mandate issue forthwith. The motion to dismiss the appeal is .allowed, and the appeal herein dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause its judgment and sentence to be carried into execution. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 376, 238 P. 1118, 31 Okla. Crim. 207, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.