Hickman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hickman v. State

263 So. 3d 87

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 23, 2019

DocketNo. 4D17-3235

StatusPublished

This text of 263 So. 3d 87 (Hickman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hickman v. State, 263 So. 3d 87 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*88Appellant appeals the revocation of his probation raising multiple issues on appeal. We affirm all issues. However, we remand with instructions for the trial court to correct the written revocation order to conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement, which found two grounds for revocation: felon in possession of a firearm and felon in possession of ammunition. See Walker v. State , 243 So.3d 1013 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). We also remand with instructions for the trial court to enter a corrected written order, consistent with the trial court's oral pronouncement, finding that appellant poses a danger to the community. See Arnone v. State , 204 So.3d 556, 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Gross, Levine and Forst, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

*88Appellant appeals the revocation of his probation raising multiple issues on appeal. We affirm all issues. However, we remand with instructions for the trial court to correct the written revocation order to conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement, which found two grounds for revocation: felon in possession of a firearm and felon in possession of ammunition. See Walker v. State , 243 So.3d 1013 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). We also remand with instructions for the trial court to enter a corrected written order, consistent with the trial court's oral pronouncement, finding that appellant poses a danger to the community. See Arnone v. State , 204 So.3d 556, 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Gross, Levine and Forst, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 So. 3d 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickman-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack