Hickman v. State
353 So. 2d 966, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14852
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hickman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14304 →
Opinion
The judgment appealed from is affirmed. We agree, however, with appellant that there is an imperfection in his sentence. The phrase “at hard labor” is improper. Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Accordingly we remand this ease for correction of the sentence. Appellant need not be present at resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hickman v. State, 353 So. 2d 966, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14852 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).
353 So. 2d 966 (Hickman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brooks v. State
349 So. 2d 794 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)