Hickman v. McDonnell

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2010·No. 09-7098·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7098

CHESTER L. HICKMAN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROBERT MCDONNELL, Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney General, etc., et al.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00163-RAJ-TEM)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: February 2, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chester L. Hickman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Chester L. Hickman, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Hickman v. McDonnell, No.

2:09-cv-00163-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hickman v. McDonnell, (4th Cir. 2010).

Hickman v. McDonnell (Hickman v. McDonnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)