Hickman v. Hall

8 Ky. Op. 641, 1876 Ky. LEXIS 172
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMarch 23, 1876
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ky. Op. 641 (Hickman v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hickman v. Hall, 8 Ky. Op. 641, 1876 Ky. LEXIS 172 (Ky. Ct. App. 1876).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

This appeal is prosecuted in the name of W. A. Hickman alone, against F. L. Hall. As repeatedly decided, Hickman and Hall are the only parties to the appeal, and the only persons who can be affected by any decision made by this court upon this appeal.

It is the duty of the appellant or his counsel, upon filing the transcript of a record in the clerk’s office of this court, to endorse thereon or on some paper to be filed therewith, the names of all the parties, appellant and appellee, as the case is desired t0' stand on the docket of the court. Act to Amend Sec. 879, Civil Code, approved March 6, 1868.

Hall was only a nominal party, and the plaintiffs below do not seem to have been prejudiced by the dismissal of the petition as to him, and if they were, the judgment could not be reversed upon an appeal prosecuted by Hickman alone.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Ky. Op. 641, 1876 Ky. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickman-v-hall-kyctapp-1876.