Hickman v. Haines
10 Ill. 20
Opinion
The case of Ripley v. Morris, 2 Gilm. 381, is decisive of the motion. The Court there held that a writ' of error was a new action, and that whenever a non-resident commences an action either in the Circuit or Supreme Court, without filing security for the costs, the Court is required to dismiss the same.
The case is dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff in error.
Motion allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hickman v. Haines, 10 Ill. 20 (Ill. 1848).
10 Ill. 20 (Hickman v. Haines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Petrauskas v. Kipnis
357 N.E.2d 170 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)