Hickman v. Haines
10 Ill. 20
This text of 10 Ill. 20 (Hickman v. Haines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hickman v. Haines, 10 Ill. 20 (Ill. 1848).
Opinion
The case of Ripley v. Morris, 2 Gilm. 381, is decisive of the motion. The Court there held that a writ' of error was a new action, and that whenever a non-resident commences an action either in the Circuit or Supreme Court, without filing security for the costs, the Court is required to dismiss the same.
The case is dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff in error.
Motion allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Petrauskas v. Kipnis
357 N.E.2d 170 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Ill. 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickman-v-haines-ill-1848.