Hickman v. Gest

2 Ky. 297, 1 Sneed 297, 1803 Ky. LEXIS 58
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided November 11, 1803·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

The law authorizing the proceeding by attachment has not been pursued in this case, either in issuing the attachment or in subjecting the property in the hands of the garnishee to the payment of the complainant’s demand. Besides, it appears indispensably necessary that every attachment should state the nature of the demand so specially that a recovery thereon would effectually bar a subsequent demand for the same cause. Therefore, it is considered by the court, that the judgment aforesaid be reversed, annulled, and set aside, and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant his costs in this behalf expended, which is ordered to be certified to the circuit court of Livingston county. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hickman v. Gest, 2 Ky. 297, 1 Sneed 297, 1803 Ky. LEXIS 58 (Ky. Ct. App. 1803).

2 Ky. 297 (Hickman v. Gest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green Hills Mall TRG, LLC v. BakerSouth, LLC
709 F. App'x 792 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
Gregory v. Merchants State Bank
135 S.W.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1939)
State v. Underwood
86 P.2d 707 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1939)
Bransford Realty Co. v. Andrews
128 Tenn. 725 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1913)
Ewing v. Shannahan
20 S.W. 1065 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Woodward v. Boro
84 Tenn. 678 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1886)
Molton v. Henderson
62 Ala. 426 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1878)
Meeks v. Vassault
16 F. Cas. 1314 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California, 1874)
Watkins v. Specht
47 Tenn. 585 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1870)
Williamson v. Wickersham
43 Tenn. 52 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1866)
Belote v. White
39 Tenn. 703 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1859)
Goss v. Singleton
39 Tenn. 67 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1858)
Coleson v. Blanton
4 Tenn. 153 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1816)