Hickman v. Commonwealth
410 S.E.2d 88, 242 Va. 263, 8 Va. Law Rep. 1179, 1991 Va. LEXIS 142
Opinion
We granted the petition for appeal in this case to consider whether the Court of Appeals correctly ruled that the trial court did not err (1) in ruling that the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction of second-degree felony murder pursuant to Code § 18.2-33; and (2) in instructing the jury.
We have considered the questions, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals reported in 11 Va. App. 369, 398 S.E.2d 698 (1990), we will affirm the decision.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hickman v. Commonwealth, 410 S.E.2d 88, 242 Va. 263, 8 Va. Law Rep. 1179, 1991 Va. LEXIS 142 (Va. 1991).
410 S.E.2d 88 (Hickman v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
596 N.W.2d 661 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1999)
Betancourt v. Commonwealth
494 S.E.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1998)
Berkeley v. Commonwealth
451 S.E.2d 41 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1994)
Talbert v. Commonwealth
436 S.E.2d 286 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1993)