Hickman Garment Company v. National Labor Relations Board, and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

437 F.2d 956, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2686, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12015
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 5, 1971
Docket20734, 20735
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 437 F.2d 956 (Hickman Garment Company v. National Labor Relations Board, and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hickman Garment Company v. National Labor Relations Board, and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor, 437 F.2d 956, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2686, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12015 (6th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT.

These two cases are before the court on petitions filed by Hickman Garment Company to review the decisions and orders of the National Labor Relations Board reported at 184 N.L.R.B. No. 99 and 184 N.L.R.B. No. 103. The petitions of the Company were filed August 28, 1970. The Board has filed cross-applications for enforcement.

These are the second and third decisions of the Board holding Hickman Garment Company to be guilty of unfair labor practices. The decision and order reported at 172 N.L.R.B. No. 118 was enforced by this court. 6 Cir., 408 F.2d 379.

The Company requested and was granted an extension of time to January 29, 1971, for the purpose of filing its brief. The brief has not yet been filed and now is in default under the rules of this court.

Upon consideration, it is ordered that the petitions for review be and hereby *957 are dismissed for failure of petitioner to comply with the rules of this court.

It is further ordered that the cross-applications of the Board are allowed in both cases and that the orders of the Board reported at 184 N.L.R.B. No. 99 and 184 N.L.R.B. No. 103 be and hereby are enforced.

The Board filed a petition for preliminary relief, praying the Company be ordered to bargain collectively with the Union pending disposition of the review and enforcement proceedings. This petition was set for oral argument on Thursday, February 4, 1971. Counsel for the Company failed to appear after due notice. In view of this order of enforcement, the Court finds it unnecessary to act on the petition for preliminary relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
437 F.2d 956, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2686, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickman-garment-company-v-national-labor-relations-board-and-amalgamated-ca6-1971.