Hickman, Dudley Krisshawn

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 6, 2013
DocketWR-80,380-01
StatusPublished

This text of Hickman, Dudley Krisshawn (Hickman, Dudley Krisshawn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hickman, Dudley Krisshawn, (Tex. 2013).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-80,380-01

EX PARTE DUDLEY KRISSHAWN HICKMAN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 241-1237-11-A IN THE 241ST DISTRICT COURT FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of felony driving

while intoxicated and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Twelfth Court of Appeals affirmed the

conviction. Hickman v. State, No. 12-12-00140-CR (Tex.App.—Tyler Jan. 16, 2013).

Applicant contends that he was denied his right, through no fault of his own, to pursue a pro

se petition for discretionary review in this Court after his conviction was affirmed by the Twelfth

Court of Appeals. He has provided prison mail-room logs indicating that he placed with prison

officials his petition for discretionary review for mailing to this Court before the deadline for filing -2-

had passed. The petition, however, was not timely delivered to this Court, and it was dismissed as

untimely filed.

The writ record shows that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time

petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Twelfth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 12-

12-00140-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 241-123-11 from the 241st District Court

of Smith County. See Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Ex parte Crow, 180

S.W.3d 135, 138-39 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary

review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: November 6, 2013 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Crow
180 S.W.3d 135 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Ex Parte Riley
193 S.W.3d 900 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hickman, Dudley Krisshawn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickman-dudley-krisshawn-texcrimapp-2013.