Hickland v. State

8 Blackf. 365, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 28
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 26, 1847·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

INDICTMENT alleging that a certain negro had come into the state since the 1st of September, 1831, without giving bond, &c., and that the defendant, knowing, &c., had hired him, &c. Held, that the act of 1831, entitled “An act concerning free negroes and mulattoes, servants [366] and slaves,” on which the indictment was founded, is not unconstitutional. R. S. 1831, p. 375. — R. S. 1838, p. 418.— The State v. Cooper, 5 Blackf. 258.—Baptiste v. The State, Id. 283.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hickland v. State, 8 Blackf. 365, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 28 (Ind. 1847).

8 Blackf. 365 (Hickland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cory v. Carter
48 Ind. 327 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)