Hickland v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Hickland v. State

8 Blackf. 365, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 28

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 26, 1847

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 Blackf. 365 (Hickland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hickland v. State, 8 Blackf. 365, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 28 (Ind. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

INDICTMENT alleging that a certain negro had come into the state since the 1st of September, 1831, without giving bond, &c., and that the defendant, knowing, &c., had hired him, &c. Held, that the act of 1831, entitled “An act concerning free negroes and mulattoes, servants [366]*366and slaves,” on which the indictment was founded, is not unconstitutional. R. S. 1831, p. 375. — R. S. 1838, p. 418.— The State v. Cooper, 5 Blackf. 258.—Baptiste v. The State, Id. 283.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

INDICTMENT alleging that a certain negro had come into the state since the 1st of September, 1831, without giving bond, &c., and that the defendant, knowing, &c., had hired him, &c. Held, that the act of 1831, entitled “An act concerning free negroes and mulattoes, servants [366]*366and slaves,” on which the indictment was founded, is not unconstitutional. R. S. 1831, p. 375. — R. S. 1838, p. 418.— The State v. Cooper, 5 Blackf. 258.—Baptiste v. The State, Id. 283.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Blackf. 365, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickland-v-state-ind-1847.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack